Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0117313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117313

Table 3. Apparent prevalences with 95% confidence interval per locality, sampling phase and test: IFAT = indirect immunofluorescence test; DAT = direct agglutination test; PAR = parallel interpretation of the two test results; SER = serial interpretation of the two test results.

First round Second round
Tlemcen IFAT 0.35 (0.28–0.42) 0.37 (0.28–0.46)
DAT 0.15 (0.10–0.21) 0.24 (0.16–0.32)
PAR 0.41 (0.34–0.49) 0.47 (0.38–0.56)
SER 0.09 (0.05–0.14) 0.13 (0.08–0.20)
Mostaganem IFAT 0.43 (0.35–0.52) 0.27 (0.21–0.35)
DAT 0.08 (0.04–0.14) 0.13 (0.08–0.19)
PAR 0.43 (0.35–0.52) 0.29 (0.22–0.36)
SER 0.08 (0.04–0.14) 0.11 (0.07–0.17)
Tipaza IFAT 0.34 (0.28–0.40) 0.32 (0.26–0.39)
DAT 0.31 (0.25–0.37) 0.33 (0.27–0.40)
PAR 0.54 (0.47–0.61) 0.41 (0.34–0.48)
SER 0.11 (0.07–0.15) 0.24 (0.18–0.30)
Boumerdes IFAT 0.34 (0.28–0.41) 0.38 (0.29–0.48)
DAT 0.18 (0.13–0.24) 0.29 (0.21–0.39)
PAR 0.45 (0.38–0.52) 0.45 (0.35–0.55)
SER 0.08 (0.05–0.13) 0.22 (0.15–0.32)
Bejaia IFAT 0.47 (0.40–0.55) 0.47 (0.40–0.54)
DAT 0.29 (0.23–0.36) 0.36 (0.30–0.43)
PAR 0.62 (0.54–0.68) 0.52 (0.45–0.59)
SER 0.15 (0.10–0.21) 0.31 (0.25–0.38)
Jijel IFAT 0.30 (0.24–0.36) 0.37 (0.30–0.45)
DAT 0.29 (0.23–0.35) 0.29 (0.22–0.36)
PAR 0.44 (0.37–0.51) 0.41 (0.34–0.49)
SER 0.14 (0.10–0.20) 0.24 (0.18–0.31)