Table 3. Apparent prevalences with 95% confidence interval per locality, sampling phase and test: IFAT = indirect immunofluorescence test; DAT = direct agglutination test; PAR = parallel interpretation of the two test results; SER = serial interpretation of the two test results.
First round | Second round | ||
---|---|---|---|
Tlemcen | IFAT | 0.35 (0.28–0.42) | 0.37 (0.28–0.46) |
DAT | 0.15 (0.10–0.21) | 0.24 (0.16–0.32) | |
PAR | 0.41 (0.34–0.49) | 0.47 (0.38–0.56) | |
SER | 0.09 (0.05–0.14) | 0.13 (0.08–0.20) | |
Mostaganem | IFAT | 0.43 (0.35–0.52) | 0.27 (0.21–0.35) |
DAT | 0.08 (0.04–0.14) | 0.13 (0.08–0.19) | |
PAR | 0.43 (0.35–0.52) | 0.29 (0.22–0.36) | |
SER | 0.08 (0.04–0.14) | 0.11 (0.07–0.17) | |
Tipaza | IFAT | 0.34 (0.28–0.40) | 0.32 (0.26–0.39) |
DAT | 0.31 (0.25–0.37) | 0.33 (0.27–0.40) | |
PAR | 0.54 (0.47–0.61) | 0.41 (0.34–0.48) | |
SER | 0.11 (0.07–0.15) | 0.24 (0.18–0.30) | |
Boumerdes | IFAT | 0.34 (0.28–0.41) | 0.38 (0.29–0.48) |
DAT | 0.18 (0.13–0.24) | 0.29 (0.21–0.39) | |
PAR | 0.45 (0.38–0.52) | 0.45 (0.35–0.55) | |
SER | 0.08 (0.05–0.13) | 0.22 (0.15–0.32) | |
Bejaia | IFAT | 0.47 (0.40–0.55) | 0.47 (0.40–0.54) |
DAT | 0.29 (0.23–0.36) | 0.36 (0.30–0.43) | |
PAR | 0.62 (0.54–0.68) | 0.52 (0.45–0.59) | |
SER | 0.15 (0.10–0.21) | 0.31 (0.25–0.38) | |
Jijel | IFAT | 0.30 (0.24–0.36) | 0.37 (0.30–0.45) |
DAT | 0.29 (0.23–0.35) | 0.29 (0.22–0.36) | |
PAR | 0.44 (0.37–0.51) | 0.41 (0.34–0.49) | |
SER | 0.14 (0.10–0.20) | 0.24 (0.18–0.31) |