Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 17;5(3):e006989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006989

Table 3.

Subgroup analyses used to assess the effect of sodium bicarbonate in various conditions

Subgroups Trials/patients OR (95% CI) Test for overall effect Heterogeneity
Type of contrast
 Low-osmolar 14/2823 0.59 (0.37 to 0.93) Z=2.26 (p=0.024) χ²=26.61, df=13 (p=0.014), I²=51%
 Iso-osmolar 4/1189 0.76 (0.43 to 1.34) Z=0.93 (p=0.351) χ²=4.67, df=3 (p=0.198), I²=36%
Setting
 Elective 18/4162 0.76 (0.54 to 1.06) Z=1.62 (p=0.105) χ²=29.54, df=17 (p=0.030), I²=43%
 Emergency 2/118 0.16 (0.05 to 0.51) Z=3.11 (p=0.002) χ²=0.07, df=1 (p=0.784), I²=0%
Using NAC or not
 Use 1/219 0.17 (0.04 to 0.79) Z=2.26 (p=0.024) Not applicable
 Non-use 18/3741 0.71 (0.48 to 1.03) Z=1.80 (p=0.071) χ²=33.13, df=17 (p=0.011), I²=49%
Publication year
 Before 2008 4/573 0.19 (0.09 to 0.41) Z=4.26 (p=0.000) χ²=1.06, df=10 (p=0.788), I²=0%
 After 2008 16/3707 0.85 (0.62 to 1.16) Z=1.03 (p=0.302) χ²=22.13, df=15 (p=0.105), I²=32%
Manner of administration
 Continuous 18/4077 0.75 (0.53 to 1.05) Z=1.69 (p=0.091) χ²=30.21, df=17 (p=0.025), I²=44%
 Bolus 2/203 0.15 (0.04 to 0.54) Z=2.90 (p=0.004) χ²=0.23, df=1 (p=0.632), I²=0%

NAC, N-acetylcysteine.