Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 6;50(2):489–513. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12240

Table 2.

Association of Clinical Decision Support Use with Otitis Media Guideline Adherence

Guideline Adherence Metric* (n = Number of Visits) CDS Use No CDS Use Adjusted Percentage Difference in Guideline Adherence (CDS Use – No CDS Use) (p-value)
6,752 visits (%) 34,639 visits (%)
Comprehensive measures
 Comprehensive AOM care
  Achieved (n = 2,888) 851 (20.0) 2,037 (10.9) 7.5 (<.001)
  Not achieved (n = 19,983) 3,400 (80.0) 16,583 (89.1)
 Comprehensive OME care
  Achieved (n = 180) 54 (14.0) 126 (3.7) 8.6 (.01)
  Not achieved (n = 3,611) 332 (86.0) 3,279 (96.3)
All otitis media (OM)
 OM: Pain assessed
  Done (n = 39,868) 6,498 (96.2) 33,370 (96.3) −1.2 (.45)
  Not done (n = 1,523) 254 (3.8) 1,269 (3.7)
 OM: Pain treated
  Done (n = 2,730) 983 (82.0) 1,747 (32.5) 48.2 (<.001)
  Not done (n = 3,849) 216 (18.0) 3,633 (67.5)
Acute otitis media (AOM)
 AOM: Adequate diagnostic evaluation
  Done (n = 12,969) 2,559 (53.2) 10,410 (45.3) 7.5 (.2)
  Not done (n = 14,838) 2,255 (46.8) 12,583 (54.7)
 AOM: Amoxicillin used as first-line therapy
  Done (n = 15,191) 3,170 (84.9) 12,021 (76.6) 5.4 (.007)
  Not done (n = 4,228) 563 (15.1) 3,665 (23.4)
 AOM: Appropriate antibiotic for penicillin-allergic patients
  Done (n = 1,131) 223 (81.1) 908 (76.9) 4.9 (.04)
  Not done (n = 324) 52 (18.9) 272 (23.1)
 AOM: High-dose Amoxicillin prescribed
  Done (n = 9,608) 2,484 (77.9) 7,124 (58.9) 16.8 (.02)
  Not done (n = 5,678) 705 (22.1) 4,973 (41.1)
 AOM: Antibiotics appropriately not prescribed
  Done (n = 937) 117 (4.2) 820 (6.6) 2.7 (<.001)
  Not done (n = 14,379) 2,698 (95.8) 11,681 (93.4)
Otitis media with effusion (OME)
 OME: Adequate diagnostic evaluation
  Done (n = 613) 198 (19.1) 415 (5.5) 12.0 (.01)
  Not done (n = 7,917) 836 (80.9) 7,081 (94.5)
 OME: Antibiotics not prescribed
  Done (n = 2,818) 263 (88.6) 2,555 (87.1) 1.4 (.6)
 Not done (n = 411) 34 (11.4) 377 (12.9)

Note: These results describe the difference in achievement (yes/no) of each quality metric between visits where the CDS was used versus visits where the CDS was not used. All clinicians had access to the CDS. Bold text indicates p < .05.

*

Guideline adherence metrics were defined based on national guidelines, with input from a local advisory panel.

A marginal model with a logit link function and robust standard error estimates accounting for clustering in practices was used. Model included tool use (yes/no) and controlled for patient, clinician, and visit-level covariates.

Comprehensive care refers to visits eligible for at least three individual quality metrics with all of them achieved.