Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 9;12(1):88–96. doi: 10.1007/s11904-014-0241-9

Table 1.

Studies of HIV-1 integration sites (IS) in vitro and in vivo

Type of study Cell type No. of IS Location Main observations Reference
In vitro infection of T cell lines
 T cell line Jurkat 7171 GDR IS within gene dense regions [44]
 T cell line J-Lat A1 130 NP Inducible provirus in gene deserts [45]
 T cell line Jurkat 40,569 TAHM IS within genes active in mitosis, life cycle, and RNA metabolism [25]
 T cell line Jurkat 971 α-Repeat, GD IS in low expression genes [76]
 T cell line Hu primary cells and cell lines 10 TSS Latency in IS in reverse orientation compared to host gene [77]
 Cell line Hu primary cells and cell lines 3127 MLV, HIV, ASLV TU 75 % of integration into tissue-specific active genes [20]
 T cell line Jurkat 8 Heterochromatin IS within genes with low level of transcription [23]
 Cell line HeLa and H9

903 MLV

379 HIV

TU TSS favored by MLV not by HIV [30]
 T cell line SupT1 59 TU IS within genes with high gene density and GC-rich regions [22]
 T cell line SupT1 524 GDR IS within introns and alpha satellite [21]
 Cell lines Jurkat, HeLa, 293T, SW13, CEM, and A301 34 NR Specific IS determine the expression of latent proviruses [24]
 T cell line SupT1 61 TU IS not near centromere [46]
In vitro infection of primary T cells
 Primary cells Activated and rCD4 T cells infected by spinoculation

6184 inducible

6252 express

Away from CpG, α-repeat heterochromatin Latency in low expression genes. EGFP HIV similar in resting or activated. No consistent IS across models [66••]
 Primary cells Activated and rCD4 T Cells NR α-Repeat, GC region Integration site selection promotes viral expression [64•]
 Primary cells Bcl2_Transduced CD4 T Cells

224 Ac

216 Ch

493 lat

TU and HAG Integration sites in same orientation. Transcriptional interference lead to latency [19•]
 Primary cells Activated and rCD4 T cells 451 TSS and GC regions IS were selective [53]
 Primary cells Activated and rCD4 T cells 2661 TU and AG IS were similar in activated vs resting CD4 T cells [65]
 Primary cells PBMC and monocytes 754 TU IS were different in macrophages compared to dividing PBMC [54]
Integration sites in vivo and patient-derived T cells
Patients on cART PBMC, CD4 T cells 1632 Growth and cell regulation Clonal expansion of HIV-infected cells, multiple IS in BACH2 and MKL2 [68••]
 Patients on cART Unsorted PBMC 534 Proliferation and survival Multiple insertion in 12 cancer-related genes including BACH2 [69••]
 Patients on cART PBMC, rCD4 T cells 594 TU Clonally expanded cells, multiple IS in SMC5 and BACH2 genes [71•]
 Patients on cART rCD4 T cells 62 TU 92.9 % of noninduced provirus found in active transcribed units [67••]
 Patients on cART rCD4 T cells 457 TU Selective integration in BACH2 [72]
 Untreated patients PBMC, tissues 43 GDR Viral integration in coding genes [78]
 In vivo CD34+ from rhesus macaque

432 MLV

328 SIV

TU, SIV, TSS, MLV Site around TSS favored by MLV, but IS within the TU in SIV [29]
 Patients on cART rCD4 T cells 74 TU IS in actively transcribed genes [52]

GDR gene dense region, NP nuclear periphery, TAHM transcriptional associated histone modification, GD gene dessert, TSS transcription start site, TU transcriptional unit, NR not reported, rCD4 resting CD4 cells, HAG highly active genes, AG active gene, PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cells, MLV murine leukemia virus, ASLV avian sarcoma-leukosis virus, Ac acute, Ch chronic, lat latent, pat patient