Table 4.
Logistic Regression Models Predicting Erectile Dysfunction
ED-Problem List | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | Wald | OR | 95% CI | |
Step 1 | |||||
Age | .03 | .04 | .79 | 1.03 | .96 – 1.11 |
Model 1: Step 2 | |||||
PCL-M – Total score | −.02 | .03 | .41 | .98 | .93 – 1.04 |
Model 2: Step 2 | |||||
PCL-M – Re-experiencing | .05 | .12 | .19 | .66 | .84 – 1.32 |
PCL-M – Avoidance/Numbing | −.05 | .08 | .35 | .55 | .82 – 1.11 |
PCL-M – Hyperarousal | −.05 | .13 | .16 | .69 | .73 – 1.23 |
ED-Medication | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | Wald | OR | 95% CI | |
Step 1 | |||||
Age | .04 | .04 | 1.22 | 1.04 | .97 – 1.12 |
Model 1: Step 2 | |||||
PCL-M – Total score | .00 | .03 | .01 | 1.00 | .95 – 1.06 |
Model 2: Step 2 | |||||
PCL-M – Re-experiencing | .00 | .11 | .00 | 1.00 | .81 – 1.24 |
PCL-M – Avoidance/Numbing | .00 | .08 | .00 | 1.00 | .86 – 1.17 |
PCL-M – Hyperarousal | .01 | .13 | .00 | 1.00 | .78 – 1.30 |