Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Support Care Cancer. 2013 Oct 22;22(2):537–544. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2008-z

Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression model for use of bone conservation agents or DXA in patients enrolled in Medicare Part D

Independent variables § OR (95% CI) P value
Age, years (66 – 74) ≥75 1.4 (0.91-2.0) 0.13
Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic white) Hispanic 0.96 (0.53-1.7) >0.20
African-American 1.0 (0.52-2.0) >0.20
Other 0.73 (0.16-3.3) >0.20
Stage (Localized) Regional 1.5 (0.65-3.6) >0.20
Distant 7.6 (4.1-14.0) <.0001*
Unknown 1.4 (0.82-2.4) >0.20
Type of ADT (Parenteral ADT) Orchiectomy 0.12 (0.02-1.00) 0.05*
Area of residence (Big metropolitan) Metropolitan 1.3 (0.81-2.2) >0.20
Urban 0.92 (0.41-2.1) >0.20
Small urban 1.1 (0.56-2.2) >0.20
Rural 4.6 (1.6-13.6) 0.01*
Enrolled in state buy-in (No) Yes 0.98 (0.58-1.6) >0.20
% with high school (Q1: 3.87%-19.75%) Q2: 19.76% - 26.88% 1.3 (0.75-2.2) >0.20
Q3: 26.89% - 32.89% 0.41 (0.21-0.81) 0.01*
Q4: ≥32.90% 0.73 (0.38-1.44) >0.20
Median annual income (Q1: $8,063 - $27,937) Q2: $27,938 - $35,426 1.5 (0.84-2.7) 0.16
Q3: $35,427 - $49,512 1.5 (0.80-2.8) >0.20
Q4: ≥$49,513 1.3 (0.65-2.6) >0.20

1059 patients included in analysis, with 134 having a claim for bone conservation agents or for a DXA exam

§

Reference category in brackets

Categories represent quartiles, data missing for one patient

*

statistically significant

DXA: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; ADT: Androgen deprivation therapy; Q: Quartile