Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec;14(4):1001–1011. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v14i4.32

Table 5.

Relationship between reported water treatment options, storage, and handling and diarrhoeal disease incidence.

Variables Case
n=220
Control
n=220
OR (95% CI) Df P-value
Treatment drinking water
Yes 68 (30.9%) 90 (40.9%) 0.646 (0.436–0.957)
No 152 (69.1%) 130 (59.1%) 1 0.029*
Treatment options
Boiling
Yes 14 (6.4%) 17 (7.7%) 0.812 (0.390–1.690) 1 0.576
No 206 (93.6%) 203 (92.3%)
Filtration
Yes 19 (8.6%) 23 (10.5%) 0.810 (0.428–1.533) 1 0.516
No 201 (91.4%) 197 (89.5%)
Use of water guard
Yes 18 (8.2%) 26 (11.8%) 0.665 (0.353–1.251) 1 0.204
No 202 (91.8%) 194 (88.2%)
Chlorination
Yes 20 (9.1%) 26 (11.8%) 0.746 (0.403–1.381) 1 0.350
No 200 (90.1%) 194 (88.2%)
Decantation
Yes 10 (4.5%) 20 (9.1%) 0.476 (0.218–1.042) 1 0.059
No 210 (95.5%) 200 (90.1%)
Storage/container for drinking
purpose
Jar with cover 37 (17.9%) 56 (28.6%) 0.592 (0.372–0.943) 4 0.027*
Big plastic container 79 (38.2%) 83 (42.3%) (1)
Small plastic container 80 (38.6%) 52 (26.5%)
Metal tank 7 (3.4%) 4 (1.9%)
Clay pot 4 (1.9%) 1 (0.5%)
Material for collecting drinking
water from storage
Cup with handle 84 (40.6%) 128 (65.3%)
Use of tap 12 (5.8%) 3 (1.5%)
By pouring 35 (16.9%) 34 (17.3%)
Dipping in any container 76 (36.7%) 31 (15.5%) 3.218 (2.010–5.151) 3 0.000*
*

=p<0.05