Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec;14(4):1001–1011. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v14i4.32

Table 6.

Relationship between reported excreta disposal method of caregivers/mothers and diarrhoeal disease incidence among under five children.

Human waste disposal Cases
N=200
Controls
N=220
OR (95% CI) df P-value
Latrine available in the house
Yes 205 (93.2%) 211 (95.9%)
No 15 (6.8%) 9 (4.1%) 0.583 (0.250–1.362) 1 0.208
Latrine type
Pit 78 (38%) 61 (28.9%) 1.432 (0.956–2.145) 3 0.081
Aqua privy 1 (0.5%) 1 (0.5%) (1)
Pour flush 23 (11.2%) 17 (8.1%)
Water closet 103 (62.6%) 132 (62.6%)
Latrine for more than one
household
Yes 166(81%) 70 (33.2%) 2.113 (1.345–3.319) 1 0.001*
No 39 (19%) 141 (66.8%)
Latrine condition
Adequate ventilation
Yes 188 (91.7%) 200 (94.8%) 0.608 (0.278–1.332) 1 0.210
No 17 (8.3%) 11 (5.2%)
Adequate water
Yes 189 (92.2%) 206 (97.6%) 0.287 (0.103–0.798) 1 0.011*
No 16 (7.8%) 5 (2.4%)
Dirt around
Yes 16 (7.8%) 5 (2.4) 3.488 (1.253–9.705) 1 0.011*
No 189 (92.2%) 206 (97.6%)
Faeces on the floor
Yes 7 (3.4%) 0 (0%) 0.966 1 0.007*
No 198 (96.6%) 211 (100%) (No)
Wet floor
Yes 31 (15.1%) 20 (9.5%) 1.701 (0.935–3.096) 1 0.079
No 174 (84.9%) 191 (90.5%)
Foul smell
Yes 45 (22%) 22 (10.4%) 2.416 (1.392–4.195) 1 0.001*
No 160 (78%) 189 (89.6%)
Clean surrounding
Yes 172 (83.9%) 187 (88.6%) 0.669 (0.380–1.177) 1 0.161
No 33 (16.1%) 24 (11.4%)
*

=p<0.05