Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar;15(1):226–232. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.29

Table 3.

Where artificial diastema was created

Dental clinic *Non-dental clinic Total (%) p-value
Level of Education
Non formal 1 5 6(12.5)
Primary 0 1 1(2.1) 0.201
Secondary 10 6 16(33.3)
Tertiary 12 13 25(52.1)
Gender
Male 4 7 11(23.0) 0.382
Female 19 18 37(77.0)
Where artificial midline diastema was done
Patient with
complications after
artificial diastema
Yes 13 16 29(60.4) 0.597
No 10 9 19(39.6)
Patient with regrets
after artificial diastema
Yes 10 12 22(45.8) 0.753
No 13 13 26(54.2)
Total 23(47.9) 25(52.1) 48(100.0)
*

beauty salon, local dental quack