Table 3.
Where artificial diastema was created
| Dental clinic | *Non-dental clinic | Total (%) | p-value | |
| Level of Education | ||||
| Non formal | 1 | 5 | 6(12.5) | |
| Primary | 0 | 1 | 1(2.1) | 0.201 |
| Secondary | 10 | 6 | 16(33.3) | |
| Tertiary | 12 | 13 | 25(52.1) | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 4 | 7 | 11(23.0) | 0.382 |
| Female | 19 | 18 | 37(77.0) | |
| Where artificial midline diastema was done | ||||
|
Patient with complications after artificial diastema |
||||
| Yes | 13 | 16 | 29(60.4) | 0.597 |
| No | 10 | 9 | 19(39.6) | |
|
Patient with regrets after artificial diastema |
||||
| Yes | 10 | 12 | 22(45.8) | 0.753 |
| No | 13 | 13 | 26(54.2) | |
| Total | 23(47.9) | 25(52.1) | 48(100.0) | |
beauty salon, local dental quack