Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar;15(1):188–196. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.25

Table 3.

Performance of the RTHB developmental checklist screen

PEDS tools PEDS: Path A and B
indicating fail
Sensitivity 25% (26/104) 25% (15/61)
Specificity 91% (88/97) 86% (120/140)
Positive predictive value 74% (26/35) 43% (15/35)
Negative predictive value 53% (88/166) 72% (120/166)
Overall hit rate 57% (114/201) 67% (135/201)