Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0118824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118824

Table 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters for resveratrol and its conjugate formulations in rats.

AUC0-∞ t½ MRT CL Vss
(μmol.h/L) P value, 95% CI (h) P value, 95% CI (h) P value, 95% CI (L/h/kg) P value, 95% CI (Significance) (L/kg) P value, 95% CI (Significance)
MeO-PEG-RSV ether 5 kDa; 2 mg/kg (n = 6) 50 ± 15 0.0003*** 5.3 ± 2.1 0.0086** 5.9 ± 3.5 0.0361* 0.19 ± 0.06 0.0003*** 1.01 ± 0.41 0.009**
MeO-PEG-RSV ether 2 kDa; 2 mg/kg (n = 5) 74 ± 16 0.0001**** 5.5 ± 1.4 0.015** 7.1 ± 2.0 0.0012** 0.12 ± 0.02 0.001*** 0.87 ± 0.28 0.0170*
MeO-PEG-PLAO-Succ-RSV 2kDa; 2 mg/kg (n = 6) 21 ± 17 0.0645 1.7 ± 0.5 0.512 1.9 ± 0.4 0.214 0.58 ± 0.26 0.0004*** 1.12 ± 0.60 0.0094**
Resveratrol; 10 mg/kg (n = 4) 2.4 ± 0.7 Not applicable 1.4 ± 0.9 Not applicable 1.3 ± 1.0 Not applicable 20.1 ± 8.4 Not applicable 26.8 ± 19.1 Not applicable

2 mg/kg = 8.8 μmol/kg; 10 mg/kg = 44 μmol/kg. Doses are resveratrol equivalents and data are mean ± SD.

MRT: mean residence time;

CL: clearance; Vss: volume of distribution at steady-state.

P values are from comparison of a particular group against resvertrol,

* ** *** **** indicate p <0.05, increasing number of stars implies increasing significance.