Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 4;30(4):476–482. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3131-3

Table 2.

Change in Diabetes Process of Care by Study Arm and Practice Characteristic

Practice Characteristic RAP CQI SD Differential Intervention Effect*
Location Rural .78 3.11 .23 F(2,2352) = 26.06, p < .001
Urban .08 .67 .98
p value within arm .006 <.001 .004
Size <4 clinicians 0.59 2.49 0.76 F(2,2349) = 11.36, p < .001
> = 4 clinicians .03 .53 0.74
p value within arm .02 <.001 .91
EHR No 0.41 1.37 0.79 F(2,2352) = 0.26, p = .7720
Yes 0.06 1.24 0.69
p value within arm .17 .71 .62
% Medicaid <20 % 0.23 1.51 0.92 F(2,2352) = 3.00, p = .0498
≥20 % 0.43 0.76 0.32
p value within arm .48 .08 .02
Practice Culture Assessment
Change Culture Low† .70 .28 .59 F(2,2349) = 6.74, p = .0012
Medium† .28 1.14 .76
High† -.16 1.99 .93
  p value within arm .048 .005 .22
Work Culture Low† .69 .13 .50 F(2,2349) = 9.07, p = .0001
Medium† .36 1.33 .84
High† .02 2.54 1.17
  p value within arm .18 <.001 .005
Chaos Low† .40 1.51 .87 F(2,2349) = 0.63, p = .5331
Medium† .28 1.13 .78
High† .11 .75 .69
  p value within arm .62 .11 .53

*Three-way interaction term (PC x arm x time) indicates that the moderator had a differential effect on outcomes over time across the intervention arms;

†for PCA scales, this represents change at the overall practice mean score and 10 points below and above the mean.

‡Covariates include age, gender, and medical and psychiatric comorbidities.