Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 17;30(4):462–468. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3098-0

Table 3.

Hazard Ratios for Primary and Secondary Outcomes Across Diet Drink Consumption Strata

Models Outcomes
Cardiovascular events Cardiac death Overall death
HR (95 % CI) HR (95 % CI) HR (95 % CI)
Model I* N: 59,614 N: 59,447 N: 59,447
0–3/month 1.0 1.0 1.0
1–4/week 0.9 (0.9–1.02) 0.8 (0.7–0.99) 0.9 (0.8–0.9)
5–7/week 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 0.8 (0.6–0.99) 0.8 (0.8–0.9)
≥ 2/day 1.2 (1.04–1.3) 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
Model II N: 55,073 N: 55,073 N: 55,073
0–3/month 1.0 1.0 1.0
1–4/week 1.0 (0.96–1.1) 1.0 (0.8–1.2) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
5–7/week 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 1.1 (1.0–1.2)
≥ 2/day 1.6 (1.4–1.9) 1.8 (1.3–2.4) 1.5 (1.3–1.7)
Model III N: 53,037 N: 53,037 N: 53,037
0–3/month 1.0 1.0 1.0
1–4/week 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 0.9 (0.8–1.1) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
5–7/week 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 1.1 (1.0–1.2)
≥ 2/day 1.3 (1.2–1.5) 1.4 (1.04–1.9) 1.4 (1.2–1.6)
Model IV§ N: 33,619 N: 33,619 N: 33,619
0–3/month 1.0 1.0 1.0
1–4/week 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
5–7/week 1.1 (0.9–1.2) 0.9 (0.7–1.3) 1.1 (0.9–1.2)
≥ 2/day 1.3 (1.1–1.5) 1.5 (1.03–2.3) 1.3 (1.04–1.5)

HR hazard ratios, CI confidence intervals

*Model I was unadjusted

Model II was adjusted for age, race, education and income

Model III was adjusted for the variables in Model II plus smoking status, BMI, and a history of diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia

§Model IV was adjusted for the variables in Model III plus alcohol intake, log calibrated energy intake, physical activity, sugar-sweetened beverage intake, salt intake, and hormone therapy. Adjusted cardiac event models were stratified on hypertension, and high cholesterol and adjusted mortality models were stratified on hypertension and the history of diabetes because these variables did not meet the proportional hazards assumption

The majority of loss of patients in model 4 was secondary to missing data for salt intake and calibrated energy