Fig. 11.

The experimental systematic uncertainty on the dijet balance (squares) and bisector (circles) methods as a function of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\bar {p}_{\mathrm{T}} $\end{document}, for jets with |y|<0.8. Also shown is the absolute value of the relative difference between the two methods in each p _T bin for data (dot-dashed lines) and for Monte Carlo simulation (dashed lines)