Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 2;73(3):2306. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Fractional jet p T resolution as a function of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\bar {p}_{\mathrm{T}} $\end{document} for anti-k t with R=0.6 jets in the Extended Tile Barrel (top), Transition (center) and End-Cap (bottom) regions using the bisector method. In the lower panel of each figure, the relative difference between the data and the MC simulation results is shown. The dotted lines indicate a relative difference of ±10 %. The curves correspond to fits with the functional form in Eq. (9). The errors shown are only statistical