Skip to main content
letter
. 2013 Mar 2;73(3):2328. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2328-7

Table 2.

Systematic uncertainties on the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$t\bar {t}$\end{document} cross section

Source of uncertainty Relative uncertainty
ISR/FSR 15 %
Event generator 11 %
Hadronisation model 6 %
PDFs 2 %
Pile-up 1 %
b-jet tagging efficiency 9 %
Jet energy scale 5 %
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}$\end{document} significance mismodelling 5 %
b-jet trigger efficiency 3 %
Jet energy resolution 2 %
Fit systematic uncertainties 4 %
Luminosity 4 %
Total uncertainty 24 %