Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Sci. 2014 Jul 15;3(2):189–201. doi: 10.1177/2167702614534211

Table 1.

Regressions of the externalizing disorder composite onto polygenic scores and covariates in adolescents and young adults. Model I includes gender and age as covariates. Model II includes gender, age, and parental externalizing disorder (ED) history as covariates.

ADOLESCENTS

Model I (N = 246) Model II (N = 246)

B SE B t B SE B t

Intercept -2.48 0.24 -10.45 -2.57 0.24 -10.75
Polygenic score 6.33 1.33 4.74 5.85 1.51 3.87
Gender -0.10 0.04 -2.34 -0.09 0.04 -2.06
Age 0.12 0.01 8.34 0.12 0.01 8.61
Parental history
 Either parent ED -- -- -- set as reference
 Neither parent ED -- -- -- -0.08 0.05 -1.68
 Incomplete parent ED history -- -- -- 0.12 0.06 2.09

YOUNG ADULTS

Model I (N = 190) Model II (N = 190)

B SE B t B SE B t

Intercept 0.36 0.49 0.46 0.54 0.50 1.08
Polygenic score 12.62 3.00 4.21 10.49 3.34 3.14
Gender 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.01 0.10 0.06
Age -0.02 0.02 -1.06 -0.03 0.22 -1.25
Parental history
 Either parent ED -- -- -- set as reference
 Neither parent ED -- -- -- -0.18 0.11 -1.53
 Incomplete parent ED history -- -- -- -0.30 0.11 -2.61

Note. Bolded statistics significant at p < .05. Bolded and italicized statistics significant at p < .01. The ‘neither parent ED’ contrast was not significant in the multivariate model for adolescents or young adults; however, it did have univariate main effects in the respective models (B = -0.25, t = -6.68, p < 0.001 and B = -0.44, t = -3.21, p < 0.001, respectively).