Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0120128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120128

Table 1. Animal models that have been or are currently being used for papillomavirus research; strengths and deficiencies are noted.

Model Strengths Deficiencies
Bovine[46] Abundant production of virus. Different strains of virus, both mucosal and cutaneous. Animals are too large to be practical for use in laboratory studies.
Primate[47] Closely allied with the human system. High cost and challenging for many institutions.
Canine[48] Both mucosal and cutaneous. Lesions regress rapidly. High cost.
Rabbit CRPV model[43,44] NZW rabbit is a docile laboratory animal. Cancers occur without applied cofactors. Both progressive and regressive strains are available. DNA is infectious. Virus is cutaneous-tropic. Minimal virus is produced in the domestic rabbit. Wild rabbits, the natural host, are difficult to house and maintain.
Rabbit ROPV model [49] Mucosal virus infects both tongue and genital tissues. Natural host is the domestic rabbit. Lesions are highly productive of virus. Lesions regress quickly. Virus is somewhat unstable and viral DNA is difficult to clone in bacteria.(unpublished observations)
Transgenic mouse models[3,50,51] Oncogenes E6 and E7 can be studied both separately and together. The virus, itself, is not present in these animals. Oncogenes are expressed from heterologous promoters.
Mastomys coucha model[52] Genital tissues are among those infected. Animals are co-infected with McPV2 and MnPV allowing for study of dual infections. Host is a wild rodent from Africa. There is a single outbred colony in the laboratory in Germany.
Pseudovirus infections in mouse and simian vaginal tissues[9,42] Early entry events can be studied using reporter gene encapsidated by human papillomavirus capsids. NOT a virus infection, although often described as such. Reporter protein signal is transient and does not persist beyond 72 hours.