Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0121570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121570

Fig 6. Comparison of the patterns of 3R and pTau distribution in the brains of the low and higher expresser mutant 3R Tau tg mice.

Fig 6

A. Vibratome sections were immunostained with an antibody against 3R Tau and analyzed by digital bright field microscopy. Panels to the left are low-magnification (20X) photomicrographs of regions of interest, including the neocortex, hippocampus CA1 and dentate gyrus (DG) regions in the non-tg and mutant 3R Tau tg Lines 2 and 13 lines mice. Panels to the right are higher magnification (600X) of the corresponding regions displaying low levels of 3R Tau immunoreactivity in neuronal cells bodies in Line 2 and high levels of immunostaining in Line 13. B. Image analysis of numbers of neuronal cells in the neocortex and C dentate gyrus displaying 3R Tau aggregates. D. Vibratome sections were immunostained with the PHF-1 antibody against pTau (Ser396 and Ser404) and analyzed by digital bright field microscopy. Panels to the left are low-magnification (20X) photomicrographs of regions of interest, including the neocortex, hippocampus CA1 and DG regions in the non-tg and mutant 3R Tau tg Lines 2 and 13. Panels to the right are higher magnification (600X) of the corresponding regions displaying low levels of PHF-1 immunoreactivity in neuronal cells bodies in Line 2 and high levels of immunostaining in Line 13. Image analysis of the overall levels of PHF-1 immunoreactivity expressed as optical density in the E neocortex and F dentate gyrus. Mice were 8–10 month old. N = 12 non-tg, N = 12 3R Tau tg Line 2, N = 12 3R Tau tg Line 13. * = P < 0.05 compared with non-tg by one-way ANOVA with Dunnet post hoc analysis. # = P < 0.05 when comparing Line 2 and 13 using one way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer posthoc test. Low magnification box scale bar = 250 μm; high power panels scale bar = 25 μm.