Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Demography. 2015 Feb;52(1):233–257. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0365-y

Table 1.

Sample characteristics at T0 (in 2005) for those who subsequently migrated to urban destinations and stayed, rural-urban-rural return migrants, and respondents who remained in rural Kanchanaburi: Means (standard deviations) or percentages (n)

Characteristics Rural-to-Urban Migrants (N = 179) Rural-Urban-Rural Return Migrants (N = 113) Kanchanaburi Residents (N = 2,217)
Age (mean years: 18-29) 21 07 (3 11)***, *** 22.86 (3.67)*** 24.37 (3.43)
Sex (%)
    Male 48.6 (87)*, ** 59.3 (67)*** 36.9 (819)
    Female 51.4 (92) 40.7 (46) 63.1 (1,398)
Marital status (%)
    Single 63.1 (113)***, *** 42.5 (48)*** 25.4 (563)
    Married 34.1 (61)**, *** 52.2 (59)*** 72.0 (1,597)
    Divorced, widowed, separated 2.8 (5)n.s., n.s. 5.3 (6) 2.6 (57)
Occupation (%)
    Professional 5.0 (9)n.s., 6.2 (7)n.s. 8.3 (185)
    Skilled 31.8(57)**, *** 50.4 (57)n.s. 50.3 (1,116)
    Manual labor 19.6 (35)n.s., n.s. 19.5 (22)n.s. 16.8 (373)
    Student 34.6 (62)***, *** 10.6 (12)** 4.0 (88)
    Not working 8.9 (16)n.s., *** 13.3 (15)* 20.5 (455)
Education (%)
    None 1.1 (2)**, *** 7.1 (8)n.s. 10.1 (225)
    Primary (1-6 yrs) 24.0 (43)***, *** 44.2 (50)n.s. 40.9 (906)
    Secondary (7-12 yrs) 58.1 (104)**, *** 42.5 (48)n.s. 40.9 (906)
    Undergraduate/masters (13+ yrs.) 16.8 (30)**, *** 6.2 (7)n.s. 8.1 (179)
Birthplace (%)
    This village/tambon 73.2 (131)n.s., *** 67.3 (76)* 57.8 (1,281)
    Other district/province 26.3 (47)n.s., * 31.0 (35)n.s. 32.8 (728)
    Other country 0.6 (1)n.s., *** 1.8 (2)** 9.3 (207)
Previous migration (%)
    Migrated between July 2004 and 2005 survey 41.9 (75)n.s., *** 48.7 (55)*** 28.8 (638)
n.s

p > .10

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001