Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Demography. 2015 Feb;52(1):233–257. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0365-y

Table 8.

Coefficients on the association between migration status and health outcomes measured at T1 (in 2007), controlling for sociodemographic characteristics (standard errors are shown in parentheses)

Covariates Physical Health (PCS) (N = 544) Mental Health (MCS) (N = 544)
Migration Status
    Rural-to-urban migrants (ref. = urban comparison group) 2.937*** (0.914) 2.802** (0.963)
    Rural-urban-rural return migrants (ref. = urban comparison group) –0.670 (1.204) 0.389 (1.183)
Interaction Terms
    Rural-to-urban migrant × Male –2.721* (1.303) a
    Return migrant × Male 0.347 (1.5 54)
Control Variables
    Sex (ref. = female) 2.807*** (0.856) 0.051 (0.876)
    Age at T1 (continuous) 0.004 (0.097) 0.284* (0.139)
    Single at T1 (ref. = married) 0.236 (0.724) 1.019 (1.040)
    Widowed/divorced/separated at T1 0.667 (1.828) 1.821 (2.639)
    Working at T1 (ref. = not working) 0.171 (1.233) –0.971 (1.755)
    Studying at T1 (ref. = not working) 1.659 (1.490) 0.280 (2.127)
    Looking for a job at T1 (ref. = not working) 0.633 (2.186) 1.793 (3.147)
    Primary education at T1 (ref. = no education) –4.711* (2.213) –2.285 (3.185)
    Secondary education at T1 (ref. = no education) –1.052 (2.199) –2.190 (3.168)
    Higher education at T1 (ref. = no education) –4.567* (2.280) –2.846 (3.289)
Constant 54.346*** (3.490) 43.327*** (4.916)

Notes: Previous migration experience since birth (and before 2005 for the migrant groups) was not significantly associated with physical or mental health status in 2007 and therefore is not included in the final models.

Goodness-of-fit for physical health (PCS): R2 = .058, adjusted R2 = .034. Goodness-of-fit for mental health (MCS): R2 = .029, adjusted R2 = .007.

a

There is no significant interaction in the mental health model.

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001