Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2015 Mar;26(2):271–279. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000236

Table 3.

Number and percent of days fulfilling Condition 1 and Condition 2 a across each city-season, with the index pollutant as NO2 and PM2.5 separately

Index pollutant: NO2 Index pollutant: PM2.5
Burbank No. (%) Houston No. (%) Pittsburgh No. (%) Burbank No. (%) Houston No. (%) Pittsburgh No. (%)
Summer Condition 1 10 (4.6) 47 (17.7) 17 (6.8) 26 (11.9) 46 (17.4) 39 (15.6)
Condition 2 2 (0.9) 17 (6.4) 1 (0.4) 8 (3.7) 17 (6.4) 14 (5.6)
Winter Condition 1 21 (10.6) 63 (23.8) 37 (15.4) 32 (16.2) 68 (25.7) 30 (12.4)
Condition 2 5 (2.5) 16 (6.0) 4 (1.7) 9 (4.5) 13 (4.9) 2 (0.8)
a

Condition 1 stipulates that the absolute value-daily differences of the index pollutant exceed the study period-IQR; Condition 2 requires Condition 1 as well as stipulating that the absolute value of the co-pollutant’s daily difference is in the lower tertile of daily difference absolute values (when NO2 is the index pollutant, PM2.5 is the co-pollutant and vice versa).

Abbreviations:

NO2, nitrogen dioxide; PM2.5, particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5μm