Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Spine J. 2014 Dec 15;15(4):692–699. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.12.010

Table 4.

Time series regression model for the monthly change in the proportion of Bone Morphogenetic Protein use with lumbar and cervical fusion in the United States in relationship to the FDA Public Health Notification

Lumbar fusion Cervical fusion
Change in % monthly BMP use
   Post FDA trend −0.978*** −0.231
(−3.96) (−1.66)
   Change in percent female 7.089 −1.469
(0.57) (−0.31)
   Change in mean age −0.597* −0.0844
(−2.01) (−0.35)
   Change in mean charlson score 1.113 −7.402
(0.13) (−1.75)
   Constant 0.658*** 0.167*
(3.83) (2.28)

ARMA
   time lag (1 month) −0.344*** −0.319***
(−3.80) (−3.68)

Sigma
   Constant 1.646*** 0.870***
(19.28) (16.71)

Pre vs. post trend p-value 0.000*** 0.035*
Number of months 123 123

t statistics in parentheses

Estimates based on weighted sample from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001