Table 4.

Difference of effect of different lamp types on the number of invertebrates captured in traps. Data collected over 32 total nights split among two rural (eight nights each) and one urban site (16 nights) in Los Angeles County, California, March–May 2014.

pairwise comparison	mean (*p < 0.05)	95% HDI	expected relative difference in insect capture (%)
all specimens
A–no	1.97*	1.8 : 2.13	717
B–no	1.66*	1.48 : 1.82	526
C–no	1.65*	1.47 : 1.82	521
C–A	−0.32*	−0.41:−0.22	−27
C–B	0.0019	−0.105 : 0.098	0.2
LED–A	−0.13*	−0.22:−0.038	−12
LED–B	0.18*	0.084 : 0.28	20
LED–C	0.19*	0.089 : 0.28	21
LED–CFL	−0.37*	−0.47:−0.29	−31
Diptera
A–no	2.83*	2.55 : 3.13	1695
B–no	2.61*	2.31 : 2.9	1360
C–no	2.51*	2.22 : 2.81	1230
C–A	−0.32*	−0.44:−0.21	−27
C–B	−0.096	−0.22 : 0.027	−9
LED–A	−0.2*	−0.32:−0.087	−18
LED–B	0.022	−0.1 : 0.15	2
LED–C	0.12	−0.0042 : 0.24	12
LED–CFL	−0.27*	−0.39:−0.16	−24
Lepidoptera
A–no	1.75*	1.2 : 2.3	574
B–no	1.38*	0.81 : 1.95	397
C–no	1.32*	0.76 : 1.9	374
C–A	−0.43*	−0.78:−0.066	−35
C–B	−0.058	−0.44 : 0.32	−6
LED–A	0.49*	0.18 : 0.79	163
LED–B	0.86*	0.52 : 1.2	236
LED–C	0.92*	0.59 : 1.2	251
LED–CFL	−0.88*	−1.11:−0.65	−58
Hemiptera
A–no	0.61	−0.37 : 1.62	84
B–no	0.21	−0.74 : 1.23	23
C–no	0.4	−0.56 : 1.41	49
C–A	−0.21	−1.08 : 0.65	−19
C–B	0.19	−0.7 : 1.09	21
LED–A	0.85*	0.098 : 1.62	234
LED–B	1.25*	0.41 : 2.14	349
LED–C	1.06*	0.26 : 1.86	288
LED–CFL	0.45	−0.24 : 1.15	57