Table 4.
Sample characteristicsa.
|
|
Tailored condition t0
(n=277) |
Control condition t0
(n=274) |
Baseline differences (tailored vs control condition), P value |
Total t1
(n=360) |
Dropout analysis (t1available vs t1not available), P value |
|
| Female, n (%) | 162 (58.5) | 162 (59.1) | .474 | 216 (60.0) | .467 | |
| Age in years, mean (SD) | 52.2 (13.1) | 52.7 (13.0) | .668 | 51.8 (13.1) | .116 | |
| Family status, n (%) | ||||||
|
|
Single | 67 (24.2) | 77 (28.1) | .742 | 100 (27.8) | .341 |
|
|
Married | 162 (58.5) | 150 (54.7) |
|
194 (53.9) |
|
|
|
Divorced | 39 (14.1) | 37 (13.5) |
|
52 (14.4) |
|
|
|
Widowed | 9 (3.2) | 10 (3.6) |
|
14 (3.9) |
|
| Educational level, highb, n (%) | 148 (53.4) | 140 (51.1) | .322 | 198 (55.0) | .089 | |
| Working status, employed, n (%) | 145 (55.6) | 160 (58.4) | .282 | 207 (57.5) | .786 | |
| Years since diagnosisc, mean (SD) | 11.1 (7.6) | 10.5 (8.0) | .649 | 10.7 (8.2) | .858 | |
| Current diabetes treatment a | ||||||
|
|
Dietary change | 40 (44.4) | 46 (51.7) | .371 | 57 (50.0) | .535 |
|
|
Insulin | 35 (38.9) | 25 (28.1) | .154 | 43 (37.7) | .139 |
|
|
Oral anti-diabetics | 59 (65.6) | 55 (61.8) | .643 | 80 (70.2) | .023 |
| Disability scored, mean (SD) | 41.4 (22.5) | 42.7 (22.8) | .573 | 42.2 (20.9) | .855 | |
| System usage in minutes, mean (SD) | 51.16 (39.7) | 37.6 (35.0) | <.001 | 49.7 (35.1) | <.001 | |
at0 = demographic data available (ITT population); t1= at least one outcome after intervention reported.
bmore than 10 years of education.
cfor patients with diabetes.
dfor patients with back pain.