Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 9;4(1):e18. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3285

Table 1.

Sociodemographic profile of the study group (n=22).

  Twitter (n=6) Facebook (n=8) YouTube (n=8) P valued
  n Valid % n Valid % n Valid %  
Grade              

Grade 9 4 66.7 6 75.0 4 50.0 0.66    

Grade 10 2 33.3 2 25.0 4 50.0
Age  




 

14 years old 3 50.0 6 75.0 4 50.0 0.83

15 years old 2 33.3 2 25.0 3 37.5

16 years old 1 16.7 - - 1 12.5
Gender  




 

Male 3 50.0 4 50.0 5 62.5 1.00

Female 3 50.0 4 50.0 3 37.5
Parent’s employment  




 

Unemployed - - 1 12.5 - - 1.00

Employed 6 100.0 7 87.5 8 100.0
Country of Birth  




 

China 3 50.0 - - - - 0.02 

Hong Kong 3 50.0 7 87.5 7 87.5

Others - - 1 12.5 - -
Ethnicity a  




 

Chinese 1 100.0 7 87.5 1 100.0 1.00

Others - - 1 12.5 - -
Years of speaking English



 

5-10 years 5 83.3 3 37.5 6 75.0 0.22

11-16 years 1 16.7 5 62.5 2 25.0
Parent’s income b  




 

<30000HKD - - - - - - 1.00

30000-40000HKD - - 1 14.3 - -

>40000HKD 6 100.0 6 85.7 6 100.0
Dental experience  




 

Irregular 2 33.3 - - 2 25.0 0.28  

Regular  4 66.7 8 100.0 6 75.0
Social media experience  




 

Seldom - - 1 12.5 1 12.5 0.32

Sometimes 1 16.7 1 15.4 - -

Often 1 16.7 5 62.5 4 50.0

Always 4 66.7 1 12.5 3 37.5  

a12 participants did not complete this section

b3 participants did not complete this section

c1USD = 7.76HKD

d P-value of 2-sided Fisher’s exact test (in 2 decimal places); Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the proportions among the 3 different media groups.