Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 19;17(2):e45. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3564

Table 5.

Direct, indirect, and total effects.a

Path R 2 Q2 Standardized path coefficient, β (95% CI) t 1999(bootstrap)
Total effect




Health-related Internet use .2395 .1531



Perceived health risk (c1)

.135*(.036, 234) 2.676


Health consciousness (c2)

.447***(.351, .542) 9.168
Direct effect




Perceived usefulness of the Internet .1821 .1460



Perceived health risk (a11)

.309***(.216, .401) 6.538


Health consciousness (a21)

.269***(.165, .373) 5.063

Attitude toward Internet use .5284 .4074



Perceived usefulness of the Internet (d)

.334***(.224, .443) 5.955


Perceived health risk (a12)

.063 (–.034, .160) 1.278


Health consciousness (a22)

.270***(.167, .374) 5.118


Perceived ease of Internet use (e)

.322***(.215, .429) 5.910

Health-related Internet use .3827 .2767



Attitude toward Internet use (b1)

.284***(.175, .392) 5.123


Perceived usefulness of the Internet (b2)

.266**(.155, .377) 4.681


Perceived health risk (c’1)

.019 (–.079, .117) .383


Health consciousness (c’2)

.211***(.107, .316) 3.958
Indirect effect




Health-related Internet use .3827 .2767



Attitude toward Internet use, perceived usefulness of the Internet, perceived health risk (a11.d.b1)

.029**(.013, .045) 3.609


Attitude toward Internet use, perceived usefulness of the Internet, health consciousness (a21.d.b1)

.025*(.010, .041) 3.234

aArrows show the influence direction in the hypotheses. For example, perceived health risk influences (→) health-related Internet use.

* P<.05, ** P<.01, *** P<.001.