Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 4;16(11):e244. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3444

Table 7.

Functional prototype usability results: mean and standard deviations for the individual SUS questions used in the evaluation phase (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree).

SUS question PIs, mean (SD)
(n=15)
RFs, mean (SD)
(n=5)
Overall, mean (SD)
(n=20)
I think that I would like to use this system frequently 2.9 (1.5) 3.6 (0.55) 3.1 (1.4)
I found the system unnecessarily complex 4.3 (1.0) 4.4 (0.89) 4.4 (0.99)
I thought the system was easy to use 4.3 (0.60) 4.3 (0.84) 4.3 (0.66)
I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system 4.7 (0.60) 4.0 (1.1) 4.6 (0.83)
I found the various functions in this system to be well integrated 3.5 (0.76) 3.4 (0.81) 3.5 (0.76)
I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system 4.3 (0.87) 4.0 (1.0) 4.3 (0.86)
I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly 4.2 (0.66) 4.2 (0.45) 4.2 (0.62)
I found the system very cumbersome to use 4.1 (1.1) 4.0 (1.2) 4.2 (1.0)
I felt very confident using the system 3.9 (1.1) 3.6 (0.55) 3.9 (0.99)
I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system 4.3 (1.1) 3.8 (1.6) 4.2 (1.1)