Table 3.

Regression analysis summary of predictors of restriction and monitoring in caregivers of persistently obese adolescents (n = 47).

	B	SE B	β	95% Confidence interval (B)
Restriction
Step One
Female caregiver age	0.06	0.02	0.40**	0.02,0.11
Female caregiver BMI	−0.03	0.02	−0.26	−0.07, 0.01
Female caregiver Racea	0.42	0.39	0.18	−0.36, 1.20
Adolescent age	−0.21	0.12	−0.22	−0.49, 0.07
Adolescent sexa	−0.23	0.32	−0.10	−0.88, 0.42
Family SES	0.00	0.01	0.06	−0.02, 0.02
Step Two
Female caregiver perceived self-weight	0.34	0.30	0.21	−0.26, 0.94
Step Three
Concern for youth weight	0.93	0.13	0.71***	0.66, 1.19
Monitoring
Step One
Female caregiver age	0.04	0.02	0.29	−0.00, 0.08
Female caregiver BMI	−0.03	0.02	−0.29	−0.07, 0.01
Female caregiver racea	0.05	0.36	−0.02	−0.78, 0.69
Adolescent age	−0.22	0.13	−0.27	−0.48, 0.05
Adolescent sexa	−0.25	0.30	−0.20	−0.86, 0.36
Family SES	−0.01	0.01	−0.20	−0.03, 0.01
Step Two
Female caregiver perceived self-weight	0.50	0.28	0.35	−0.06, 1.05
Step Three
Concern for youth weight	0.68	0.15	0.60***	0.37, 0.98

R² = 0.31 for Restriction Step 1 (p < .05); ΔR² = 0.02 for Restriction Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR² = 0.64 for Restriction Step 3 (p < .001).

R² = 0.17 for Monitoring Step 1 (p > .05); ΔR² = 0.06 for Monitoring Step 2 (p > .05); ΔR² = 0.39 for Monitoring Step 3 (p < .001).

^**p < .01,

^***p < .001.

^aSex (female = 1, male = 0) and race (Black = 1, White = 0) are categorical variables.