Table 3.
Location | Survival in functional condition | Median survival estimate in years | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Crude | Adjusted for loss recall bias | Adjusted for all recall biases | |
Zamfara | ||||
Year 1 | 98.9% (97.0, 99.4) | 98.2% (96.7, 99.2) | 98.2% (96.7, 99.2) | |
Year 2 | 92.4% (87.6, 95.4) | 90.6% (87.0, 93.5) | 86.4% (82.5, 89.8) | |
Year 3 | 89.9% (86.4, 92.5) | 83.6% (79.8, 87.1) | 74.7% (70.4, 78.5) | 4.74 (4.40, 5.10) |
Nasarawa | ||||
Year 1 | 88.1% (84.3, 91.1) | 84.2% (80.8, 87.4) | 84.2% (80.8, 87.4) | |
Year 2 | 69.3% (63.2, 74.8) | 66.6% (61.0, 72.0) | 64.8% (59.0, 69.9) | |
Year 3 | 53.1% (46.9, 59.3) | 45.0% (40.9, 50.5) | 41.9% (36.7, 47.2) | 2.98 (2.73, 3.21) |
Cross River | ||||
Year 1 | 92.0% (84.5, 96.0) | 92.3% (89.5, 94.6) | 92.3% (89.5, 94.6) | |
Year 2 | 89.7% (83.8, 93.7) | 87.0% (81.8, 91.4) | 78.8% (74.4, 84.1) | |
Year 3 | 88.5% (83.5, 91.9) | 80.1% (75.3, 84.4) | 70.1% (65.0, 74.8) | 4.50 (3.93, 5.71) |
Crude and recall adjusted survival estimates are shown.