Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 24;16:97. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0510-7

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival in patients with cytogenetically normal AML, for the LSC- DNM gene-sets

Dataset Variate model Variates HR 95% CI p-value
GSE12417 (n = 242) Univariate model 3 DNM fGSs vs. 4 control fGSs 0.53 0.35-0.79 0.0014**
Age group, years (≥60 vs. <60) 1.63 1.18-2.26 0.0029**
Multivariate model 3 DNM fGSs vs. 4 control fGSs 0.6 0.37-0.83 0.0038**
Age group, years (≥60 vs. <60) 1.6 1.12-2.15 0.0083**
GSE14468 (n = 214) Univariate model 3 DNM fGSs v.s 4 control fGSs 0.5 0.33-0.77 0.0012**
KRAS mutaion vs. others 70.2 7.30-674.5 8.60E-13***
ELN_risk (IntermediateI vs. Favorable) 1.8 1.27-2.62 0.00095***
Age group, years (≥60 vs. <60) 1.4 0.89-2.18 0.15
NPM1 mutation vs. others 0.8 0.57-1.12 0.19
CEBPA mutation vs. others 0.7 0.42-1.22 0.22
Gender 0.9 0.62-1.21 0.39
BM Blast (>50 vs. <=50) 1.1 0.76-1.53 0.68
NRAS mutation vs. others 1.0 0.60-1.81 0.90
Multivariate model 3 DNM fGSs v.s 4 control fGSs 0.5 0.35-0.83 0.0047**
KRAS mutaion vs. others 90.7 9.27-888.79 0.00011***
ELN_risk (IntermediateI vs. Favorable) 1.7 1.19-2.48 0.0039**
TCGA (n = 91) Univariate model 3 DNM fGSs vs. 4 control fGSs 0.4 0.19-0.67 8.23E-04***
Age group, years (≥60 vs. <60) 2.5 1.58-4.09 6.53E-05***
BM Blast (>50 vs. <=50) 0.6 0.33-1.09 0.09.
Gender 0.7 0.46-1.16 0.18
Multivariate model 3 DNM fGSs vs. 4 control fGSs 0.4 0.23-0.84 0.012*
Age group, years (≥60 vs. <60) 2.1 1.32-3.47 0.0022**

Significance code: ‘.’:p < .1; ‘*’: p < .05; ‘**’p < .01; ‘***’p < .001.

Significant univariate tested factors (p < .05) are used for multivariate test. Boldface highlights the results of DMN fGSs.