Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 20;106(3):324–327. doi: 10.1111/cas.12595

Table 4.

Frequencies of exon mutations

KRAS exon 2 (%) KRAS exon 3 (%) KRAS exon 4 (%) NRAS exon 2 (%) NRAS exon 3 (%) NRAS exon 4 (%) Total Method
PRIME 40 (440/1096) 4 (24/638) 6 (36/620) 3 (22/637) 4 (26/636) 0 (0/629) 17 Sanger SURVEYOR
20050181 45 (486/1083) 4.4 (24/548) 7.7 (41/534) 2.2 (12/536) 5.6 (30/540) 0 (0/532) 20 Sanger SURVEYOR
20020408 43 (184/427) 4.8 (8/166) 5.0 (9/180) 4.2 (7/166) 3.0 (5/168) 1.1 (2/180) 18 Sanger SURVEYOR
OPUS 43 (136/315) 6.8 9.3 6.8 5.1 0.8 26 BEAMing
CRYSTAL 37 (136/315) 3.3 5.6 3.5 2.8 0.9 15 BEAMing
PEAK N/A 4 (9/225) 7 (17/223) 5 (12/224) 6 (13/225) 0 (0/223) 22 Sanger SURVEYOR
FIRE-3 N/A 4.3 (21/431) 4.9 (24/458) 3.8 (18/464) 2 (10/468) 0 (0/458) 16 Pyrosequencing

KRAS/NRAS mutation ratio in wild type KRAS exon 2.

Next generation sequencers were used to confirm some of codon mutations.