Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0122464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122464

Table 1. Main results of eQTL mapping under different false discovery (FDR) rates.

Panel A: Without adjustment for RNA PCs, all subjects
Pairs Probes Genes SNPs
FDR<0.01
local 8117 921 841 7177
distal 1305 262 249 991
FDR<0.05
local 13857 1750 1596 11922
distal 2075 507 484 1524
FDR<0.1
local 18952 2649 2392 16087
distnat 2885 814 772 2017
Panel B: Without adjustment for RNA PCs, controls
Pairs Probes Genes SNPs
FDR<0.01
local 1544 277 257 1421
distal 679 151 140 443
FDR<0.05
local 2763 508 478 2551
distal 1465 327 312 937
FDR<0.1
local 3911 797 753 3574
distal 2455 610 584 1514
Panel C: Without adjustment for RNA PCs, cases
Pairs Probes Genes SNPs
FDR<0.01
local 1405 268 248 1281
distal 557 141 136 394
FDR<0.05
local 2628 507 475 2372
distal 1170 310 297 825
FDR<0.1
local 3837 819 761 3461
distal 1983 597 571 1353
Panel D: With adjustment for RNA PCs, all subjects
Pairs Probes Genes SNPs
FDR<0.01
local 22323 2242 2008 18746
distal 1391 321 306 1051
FDR<0.05
local 36720 3808 3391 30386
distal 1851 461 446 1461
FDR<0.1
local 50270 5461 4799 40997
distal 2272 650 627 1853