Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0120883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120883

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics and Internal Consistencies of Different Versions of Ego-resiliency Scales.

Sample Observed range Number of items Mean SD Alpha
ER89 Sample 1 1–4 14 2.89 .33 .68
Sample 2 3.00 .41 .75
ER11 Sample 1 1–4 11 2.87 .37 .68
Sample 2 2.97 .48 .77
AEW Sample 1 1–4 5 2.87 .52 .67
Sample 2 3.02 .59 .67
RPSS Sample 1 1–4 4 2.97 .46 .57
Sample 2 3.05 .60 .67
IPS Sample 1 1–4 2 2.64 .71 .64
Sample 2 2.67 .77 .74
R-CD-RISC Sample 1 1–5 10 3.80 .59 .83
Sample 2 3.80 .66 .85

Note: ER89 = Block & Kremen’s (1996) ego-resiliency scale, ER11 = our version of the ER scale, AEW = active engagement with the world, RPSS = repertoire of problem solving strategies, IPS = integrated performance under stress, R-CD-RISC = Refined Connor-Davidson Resiliency Scale