Table 5. Inter-correlation matrix for Study 2–Sample 1 and comparison of the correlations of the ER11 and ER89 scales.
| 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. | 8. | Williams’ t | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. ER89 | |||||||||
| 2. ER11 | .963*** | ||||||||
| 3. AEW | .745*** | .792*** | -3.36*** | ||||||
| 4. RPSS | .667*** | .676*** | .222** | -.45 | |||||
| 5. IPS | .563*** | .571*** | .173* | .261*** | -.63 | ||||
| 6. R-CD-RISC | .642*** | .603*** | .284*** | .576*** | .485*** | 2.23* | |||
| 7. Trait Anxiety | -.539*** | -.500*** | -.118 | -.535*** | -.541*** | -.683*** | -1.99* | ||
| 8. State Anxiety | -.310*** | -.278*** | -.023 | -.335*** | -.330*** | -.494*** | .737*** | -1.47 | |
| 9. SWB | .337*** | .323*** | .117 | .448*** | .144 | .550*** | -.623*** | -.644*** | .69 |
Notes: Pearson correlation matrix with the variables from Study 2–Sample 1. Williams’ t = t-value results (df = 141) of the pairwise comparison of the correlation coefficients of the ER11 and ER89 scales, ER89 = original version of the ER scale, ER11 = our version of the ER scale, AEW = Active Engagement with the World, RPSS = Repertoire of Problem Solving Strategies, IPS = Integrated Performance under Stress, R-CD-RISC = refined version of the CD-RISC, SWB = Subjective Well-Being
*** p ≤ .001
** p ≤ .01
* p ≤ .05