Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0121404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121404

Table 2. Characteristics of eligible studies for clinicopathological features in meta-analysis.

Author Year country Age/ Median (range) N Positive (%) Location Cut-off T N M S G ER PR NOS
Talvensaari-Mattila,A. 1998 Finland 55(NR) 169 84.00 T ≥1% 8
Jones,J.L. 1999 England NR 104 36.60 T/S ≥1% 7
Fan,S.Q. 2003 China 53.5(26–68) 66 71.20 T CS 8
Nakopoulou,L(1). 2003 Netherlands 57.31(25–87) 135 75.60 T ≥10% 7
Nakopoulou,L(2). 2003 Netherlands 57.31(25–87) 135 27.40 S ≥10% 7
Talvensaari-Mattila,A. 2003 Finland 52(26–85) 453 78.10 T ≥1% 8
Hirvonen,R. 2003 Finland NR(26–85) 137 83.20 T ≥1% 6
Li,H.C. 2004 China NR 270 56.70 T ≥1% 8
Zhou,S. 2005 China 58(41–69) 112 53.60 T/S ≥5% 7
Zhang,Y.G(1). 2007 China 54.7(30–78) 92 19.60 T ≥30% 9
Zhang,Y.G(2). 2007 China 54.7(30–78) 92 55.40 S ≥30% 9
Sullu,Y. 2011 Germany 52(22–85) 140 92.90 T CS 8
Niemiec,J.A. 2012 United States 60(37–88) 146 9.60 S ≥1% 9

NR not reported, T Tumor cells, S stromal cells, T/S either tumor cells or stromal cells, CS complex score combining intensity and percentage, √ data available for calculating OR and 95%CI.