Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 29;23(5):1355–1364. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2484-9

Table 6.

Distribution-based and anchor-based estimates of important differences

Fatigue/activity Appetite/eating
1/3 SD Baseline 1.2 1.3
Week 3 1.3 1.3
Week 6 1.3 1.2
Week 9 1.3 1.2
Week 12 1.3 1.2
1/2 SD Baseline 1.8 1.9
Week 3 2.0 1.9
Week 6 1.9 1.8
Week 9 1.9 1.8
Week 12 1.9 1.8
SEM Baseline 1.5 2.0
Week 3 1.6 2.0
Week 6 1.5 1.9
Week 9 1.5 1.8
Week 12 1.4 1.8
Cross-sectional anchors Baseline–My friends and family are pleased with my appetite Not at all vs a little bit 1.42 A little bit vs somewhat 2.15
A little bit vs somewhat 1.35 Somewhat vs quite a bit 1.97
Somewhat vs quite a bit 1.20 Quite a bit vs very much 2.22
Week 6–Performance status <70 vs 70–80 1.61 <70 vs 70–80 1.42
70–80 vs 90–100 1.42 70–80 vs 90–100 1.55
Week 6–My friends and family are pleased with my appetite A little bit vs somewhat 1.85 Not at all vs a little bit 1.16
Somewhat vs quite a bit 1.73 Quite a bit vs very much 1.06
Week 12–Performance status <70 vs 70–80 1.88
70–80 vs 90–100 1.92
Week 12–I have felt hungry A little bit vs somewhat 1.94
Somewhat vs quite a bit 0.85
Week 12–My friends and family are pleased with my appetite Not at all vs a little bit 1.24 Not at all vs a little bit 2.13
A little bit vs somewhat 2.43 Somewhat vs quite a bit 1.14
Somewhat vs quite a bit 0.81
Quite a bit vs very much 1.48
Longitudinal anchors Week 6–Change in body weight Decreased 3 kg or more 0.69
Increased 1–2.99 kg 1.47
Week 9–Change in body weight Decreased 3 kg or more 2.33
Increased 1–2.99 kg 1.35
Week 12–Change in body weight Decreased 3 kg or more 2.27
Increased 1–2.99 kg 1.21
Median (IQR) 1.5 (1.3–1.9) 1.8 (1.2–2.0)

For anchor-based analyses, only group comparisons that met all three criteria are presented: (1) correlation ≥0.3, (2) group n ≥ 10, and (3) effect size between 0.2 and 0.8

IQR interquartile range