Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 5;58(3):580–590. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201300405

Table 2.

EPA- and AA-derived eicosanoids in skin blister fluid at baseline and following 12-wk supplementation with 5 g/day of EPA-rich or control lipid

Mean (SEM) (pg/μL)a
Baseline (n = 36)b Control (n = 19) EPA (n = 17)
Unexposed UVR exposed Unexposed UVR exposed Unexposed UVR exposed
PGE2 10.2 (1.5) 20.8 (2.4)††† 10.7 (2.2) 28.1 (5.4)†† 6.0 (1.1)* 19.9 (3.4)†††
PGE3 0.6 (0.1) 1.1 (0.2) 0.6 (0.2) 1.2 (0.3) 0.8 (0.2) 3.1 (1.0)
12-HETE 12.2 (1.3) 35.4 (4.0)††† 13.1 (2.9) 51.4 (8.6)††† 13.4 (3.8) 50.3 (8.0)†††
12-HEPE 2.8 (0.3) 4.5 (0.4)††† 3.0 (0.6) 6.4 (1.9) 5.9 (1.6) 18.2 (3.4)†††,**
a

Results are presented as picogram of eicosanoid per microlitre of blister fluid.

b

Baseline: combined treatment groups pre-supplementation.

p < 0.05, ††p < 0.01, †††p < 0.001 compared to unexposed skin in the same group, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the corresponding skin (i.e. unexposed or UVR exposed) in the control group post-supplementation.