Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 26;120(4):345–351. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0446-4

Table 2.

Classification systems for positron emission tomography evaluation of response to treatment of solid tumours, adapted from Wahl et al. [15]

Parameter EORTC PERCIST
Lesion measure SUVmax and SUVmean in a manually drawn region of interest

SUV peak of the tumour

lesion with greatest uptake (primary or metastatic)

Reproducibility ±25 % liver uptake ±20 % and <0.3 SUL on liver
Timing ND <15 min difference from injection to acquisition between scans before and after treatment
Acquisition and calibration ND

Same scanner and reconstruction software should be used for scans before and after treatment

Proper calibration required

Complete metabolic response (CMR) No pathological FDG uptake foci

No FDG uptake foci below mean liver activity

No new foci

Partial metabolic response (PMR)

After first chemotherapy cycle: SUV reduction 15–25 %

After subsequent chemotherapy cycles: SUV reduction >25 %

SUL reduction >30 % in target lesion with minimum 0.8 SUL decrease

No increase in SUL or size in non-target lesions

Progressive metabolic disease (PMD)

Increase >25 % tumour SUV

or

increase >20 % tumour longest dimension

or

appearance of new lesions

SUL increase >30 % in target lesion (minimum, 0.8 SUL)

or

visible increase of lesion extent (minimum >75 % total lesion glycolysis)

or

appearance of new lesions

Stable metabolic disease (SMD) Increase <25 % or decrease <15 % tumour SUV Not CMR, PMR, or PMD

CMR complete metabolic response, EORTC European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, FDG fluorodeoxyglucose, ND not defined, PERCIST positron emission tomography response criteria in solid tumours, PMD progressive metabolic disease, PMR partial metabolic response, SMD stable metabolic disease, SUL standardised uptake value for lean body mass, SUV standardised uptake value