Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 May 9;64(4):272–290. doi: 10.3322/caac.21231

Table #2.

Multiple Treatment Comparison, Meta-Analysis of Pharmacotherapies

Short-term RR (95% CI) 12-Month RR (95% CI)
Control versus
Standard nicotine patch NRT (≤ 22 mg) 1.48 (1.30 – 1.69) 1.52 (1.43 – 1.61)
High-dose nicotine patch NRT (> 22 mg) 1.69 (1.32 – 2.11) 1.73 (1.62 – 1.84)
Combination NRT 1.34 (0.96 – 1.84) 1.68 (1.30 – 2.08)
Bupropion 1.40 (1.22 – 1.60) 1.7 (1.58 – 1.83)
Varenicline 2.39 (1.96 – 2.88) 2.19 (1.94 – 2.44)
Standard-dose nicotine patch therapy (≤22 mg) versus
High-dose nicotine patch NRT (> 22 mg) 1.15 (0.91 – 1.43) 1.14 (1.07 – 1.21)
Combination NRT 0.91 (0.62 – 1.29) 1.10 (0.85 – 1.37)
Bupropion 0.94 (0.77 – 1.15) 1.12 (1.02 – 1.22)
Varenicline 1.43 (1.26 – 1.60) 1.65 (1.29 – 2.07)
High-dose nicotine patch therapy (> 22 mg) versus
Combination NRT 0.78 (0.50– 1.20) 0.97 (0.73 – 1.23)
Bupropion 0.81 (0.6 – 1.09) 0.98 (0.88 – 1.09)
Varenicline 1.47 (1.06 – 2.01) 1.29 (1.12 – 1.46)
Combination NRT versus
Bupropion 1.04 (0.72 – 1.45) 1.01 (0.79 – 1.25)
Varenicline 1.78 (1.25 – 2.41) 1.28 (1.02 – 1.53)
Bupropion versus
Varenicline 1.61 (1.32 – 1.93) 1.29 (1.12 – 1.45)

For efficacy: RRs higher than 1 favor the row-defining treatment.

Adapted with permission from: Mills et al. Annals of Medicine, 2012;4: 588–597