Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 12;2015:836287. doi: 10.1155/2015/836287

Table 2.

Comparison of Cu(II), Pb(II), and Cd(II) adsorption capacities of this study with other recent reports using magnetic GO.

Sorbents Environmental conditions Metals Q max⁡ (mg/g) References
GO/Fe3O4 pH = 5.3, T = 20°C Cu(II) 18.3 Li et al. [3]

GO/silica/Fe3O4 pH = 7.1, T = 25°C Pb(II) 333.3 Wang et al. [9]
Cd(II) 166.7

GO/Fe3O4/sulfanilic acid pH =6.0, T = 25°C Cd(II) 55.4 Hu et al. [7]

GO-MnFe2O4 pH =5.0, T = 25°C Pb(II) 673 Kumar et al. [11]

Reduced GO/CoFe2O4 pH = 5.3, T = 25°C Pb(II) 299.4 Zhang et al. [12]
pH = 5.3, T = 35°C 274.7
pH = 5.3, T = 45°C 253.2

GO/Mn-doped Fe(III) oxide pH = 5.0, T = 25°C Cd(II) 87.2 Nandi et al. [8]
Cu(II) 129.7

GO/Fe3O4/sulfanilic acid pH = 5.0, T = 20°C Cu(II) 50.7 Hu et al. [6]
pH = 5.0, T = 30°C 56.9

GO/Fe3O4 pH = 6.0, T = 20°C Cu(II) 23.1 This study
Pb(II) 38.5
Cd(II) 4.4