Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 11;6(1):136–147. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-11-RA-0099

Table 1.

Patient safety practice adoption by primary care settings with and without EHR, years 2006–2010, n=209.

Expected relationship to EHR Items % Fully implemented n=209* Sig.**
Paper n=117 EHR n=92
Medications (16 items)
Yes Patients receive up-to-date medication list at each visit 10.3% 44.6% 0.000
Yes E-prescribing system in place 17.9% 94.6% 0.000
Yes Documentation system (manual or electronic) for all prescribed medications and renewals 57.3% 91.3% 0.000
Yes All prescribing practice staff have access to drug information and CDS for medications 88.0% 96.7% 0.001
Possible Detailed records/log on all vaccines dispensed 74.8% 90.6% 0.001
Possible Review of all medications and side effects with documentation at every visit 70.1% 85.9% 0.005
Possible Complete medication history including over-the-counter medications 82.9% 92.4% 0.016
Possible List of high-alert drugs relevant to practice that require direct physician-pharmacist contact 37.6% 54.3% 0.020
Possible Tracking system in place for all patients on warfarin 71.0% 81.6% 0.119
No Indication for all medications on all prescriptions 19.7% 44.6% 0.000
No Medications in practice checked regularly for expiration dates 88.9% 98.9% 0.000
No Detailed labeling of all multi-dose injectable vials 64.9% 83.3% 0.000
No Detailed labeling of all dispensed medications including samples 57.0% 81.7% 0.000
No External medications labeled and stored separately 52.1% 71.7% 0.009
No Up-to-date medication information for non-English speakers 30.8% 43.5% 0.072
No All child bearing age females required to have pregnancy test before teratogens prescribed 60.7% 60.9% 0.382
Handoffs and Transitions (11 items)
Yes Practice tracks all laboratory and pathology testing 68.4% 85.9% 0.013
Possible Process for learning and recording essential new information about patient from outside practice 63.2% 85.9% 0.001
Possible Patients have easy access to all laboratory and consult results 70.1% 83.7% 0.006
Possible All test results are communicated to patient in timely manner (24–48 hours) 72.6% 87.0% 0.010
Possible Confirm/record patient discharge from hospital/facility 71.8% 81.5% 0.027
Possible System in place to track critical versus routine laboratory and pathology tests 88.0% 93.5% 0.060
Possible Practice has process to communicate all medications when patient admitted to hospital/facility 79.5% 87.0% 0.110
Possible Transfer of patient is clear with new clinician responsibility accepted including patient records 70.9% 72.8% 0.330
Possible System in place for imaging test tracking 67.5% 77.2% 0.337
Possible Consultation tracking system in place 57.3% 68.5% 0.480
No Practice identifies in-office emergent situations with process in place to address them 82.1% 90.2% 0.010
Personnel/Qualifications/Competency (6 items)
No Employees educated about new drugs/products by staff/practitioners (not sales representatives) 52.1% 71.7% 0.000
No System to periodically assess physician competency 65.8% 82.6% 0.000
No Orientation to policies and procedures for nursing/technical staff 91.5% 100.0% 0.000
No Orientation to policies and procedures for all new physicians/PAs/NPs 84.6% 92.4% 0.001
No System to periodically assess nursing/support staff competency 82.1% 87.0% 0.004
No Practice maintains system for continuing education 70.9% 83.7% 0.018
Practice Management/Culture (20 items)
Possible Patients instructed on proper use/maintenance of prescribed devices 80.3% 94.6% 0.001
Possible Essential patient information clear and easily accessible to appropriate office personnel 95.7% 95.7% 0.318
No Practice encourages patients to share safety concerns in writing or in surveys 70.9% 87.0% 0.000
No When errors/near misses occur, open educational efforts used that include all personnel 76.9% 92.4% 0.002
No All office staff are HIPAA trained 90.6% 97.8% 0.004
No Practice has protocols for emotional support for all staff involved in adverse events 68.4% 75.0% 0.005
No Job descriptions for all office staff include requirements to speak up about safety issues 73.5% 85.9% 0.005
No All practice staff trained to recognize and manage health literacy issues 53.8% 72.8% 0.005
No Practice provides training to all staff in team communication 69.2% 87.0% 0.005
No Error reduction principles reviewed at orientation and performance evaluations 65.8% 87.0% 0.006
No System for reporting potential threats to patient safety/near misses 78.6% 93.5% 0.009
No Job descriptions for all clinical staff include requirements to speak up about safety issues 74.4% 85.9% 0.013
No System in place for reporting errors supported by culture of safety and openness 85.5% 94.6% 0.015
No Practice uses established tools to monitor staff fatigue/morale 60.7% 75.0% 0.018
No Safe treatment environment provided 89.7% 98.9% 0.063
No All patient complaints are documented and reviewed 76.1% 91.3% 0.097
No Patients are informed of HIPAA 98.3% 100.0% 0.123
No Measuring device suggested for prescribed oral liquids 78.6% 85.9% 0.206
No Practice uses current literature on adverse events for practice improvement 58.1% 60.9% 0.493
No Staff feel comfortable requesting time away 94.9% 96.7% 0.604
Patient Education/Communication (13 items)
Possible Practice assists patients in obtaining educational materials/resources on their conditions 78.6% 94.6% 0.021
Possible Diagnostic/treatment care plans clearly communicated to patient and caregivers 65.0% 87.0% 0.028
Possible Patients receive critical information (verbal and written) in lay terms about new prescriptions before leaving office 49.6% 63.0% 0.042
Possible Patients are assessed for financial and physical ability to obtain prescriptions/supplies 65.8% 78.3% 0.062
Possible Patient life-style information collected and used for care plan 86.3% 93.5% 0.169
Possible Chronic disease patients identified and monitoring services provided 83.8% 88.0% 0.246
Possible Process for timely email/phone correspondence with patients and other practitioners 87.2% 93.5% 0.829
No Patients and caregivers instructed to ask questions regarding medications 70.1% 91.3% 0.000
No Interpreters are available for LEP/hearing impaired patients 63.2% 79.3% 0.001
No Patients are routinely asked to repeat back instructions 61.5% 73.9% 0.010
No Patients’ participation sought in decisions regarding their care 94.9% 97.8% 0.039
No Patients asked to repeat back information and instructions they receive on phone 52.1% 62.0% 0.320
No Practitioner explains to patients all risks for procedures and testing 85.5% 93.5% 0.454

*Note: “% Fully implemented“ includes responses “fully implemented in the practice for some areas, patients, drugs, procedures and/or staff,” and, “fully implemented in the practice for all areas, patients, drugs, procedures and/or staff.”

**Calculated based on estimating gamma (γ).