Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 10;12(3):2984–3001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120302984

Table 4.

Regression analysis results, with depersonalisation as outcome and psychological capital as mediator.

Predictors Path Coefficients a × b (BCa 95% CI) R2
c a b c’
Males
Extrinsic effort 0.334 ** ‒0.228 ** ‒0.206 ** 0.287 ** 0.047 (0.022, 0.083) 0.140
Reward ‒0.144 ** 0.223 ** ‒0.249 ** ‒0.088 ‒0.056 (‒0.098,‒0.028) 0.071
Overcommitment 0.153 ** ‒0.056 ‒0.259 ** 0.139 ** 0.015 (‒0.012, 0.043) 0.081
Females
Extrinsic effort 0.314 ** ‒0.286 ** ‒0.196 ** 0.258 ** 0.056 (0.033, 0.087) 0.132
Reward ‒0.169 ** 0.237 ** ‒0.246 ** ‒0.111 ** ‒0.059 (‒0.087, ‒0.037) 0.083
Overcommitment 0.129 ** ‒0.162 ** ‒0.256 ** 0.087 ** 0.042 (0.021, 0.069) 0.080

Notes: c: associations of extrinsic effort, reward and overcommitment with depersonalization; a: associations of extrinsic effort, reward and overcommitment with PsyCap; b: association between PsyCap and depersonalization after controlling for the predictor variables; c’: associations of extrinsic effort, reward and overcommitment with depersonalization after adding PsyCap as mediator; a × b: the product of a and b; BCa 95% CI: the bias-corrected and accelerated 95% confidence interval age, marital status, education and weekly work time are covariates; ** significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).