Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 11;12(3):3026–3041. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120303026

Table 2.

A comparison of the concentrations and types of staphylococcal bacteria recovered from the bedside surfaces of bed-units occupied by MRSA-positive and MRSA-negative patients at 08:00 hours.

Types of Staphylococci
and Sampling Sites
Mean cfu/cm2 ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM)
MRSA-Positive MRSA-Negative p Value
Bed-Units (n = 6) Bed-Units (n = 30)
CNS 0.1953
Bedside table N.D. 0.04 ± 0.03
Left-side handrail 0.39 ± 0.33 0.12 ± 0.09
Right-side handrail 1.94 ± 1.13 1.20 ± 1.13
Overbed rolling table N.D. 0.29 ± 0.25
MSSA Undetermined
Bedside table N.D. 0.48 ± 0.39
Left-side handrail N.D. 1.94 ± 1.83
Right-side handrail N.D. 3.08 ± 2.17
Overbed rolling table N.D. 0.02 ± 0.01
MRSA 0.0392
Bedside table N.D. 0.68 ± 0.63
Left-side handrail 0.72 ± 0.72 6.37 ± 4.03
Right-side handrail 1.11 ± 0.98 0.57 ± 0.30
Overbed rolling table 2.11 ± 1.41 0.28 ± 0.14

Notes: A total of 36 bed-units were sampled in 6 separate days at 08:00 hours. The studied cubicle was fully occupied in all of those days, and only one MRSA-positive patient was included in each sampling day. The statistical difference in MSSA loadings between the MRSA-positive and MRSA-negative could not be determined, because the count for one comparison group was zero. N.D. = Non-detectable which means colony is absent in the petrifilm plate. The detection limit of the sampling technique was 1 cfu/Petrifilm (which is equivalent to cfu/cm2). Some of the mean cfu/cm2 values presented in this table were smaller than the detection limit as influenced by a large number of 0 (non-detectable) values (refer to Table 3 for the percentage of the positive culture at each sampling site).