Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 2;26(4):946–956. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014010108

Table 3.

Associations of cardiac biomarkers and incident HF in the CRIC Study

Cardiac Biomarker Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c
Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) P Value Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) P Value Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) P Value
Continuous predictors
 Log(hsTnT) per 1 SD (1.12) increase 1.60 (1.36 to 1.88) <0.001 1.50 (1.27 to 1.78) <0.001 1.27 (1.07 to 1.52) 0.008
 Log(NT-proBNP) per 1 SD (1.39) increase 2.30 (1.99 to 2.66) <0.001 2.11 (1.80 to 2.47) <0.001 1.99 (1.69 to 2.35) <0.001
Categorical predictorsd
 hsTnT, pg/ml (reference: undetectable)
  >5–9.3 1.75 (0.96 to 3.22) <0.001 1.96 (1.02 to 3.79) <0.001 1.98 (1.03 to 3.83) 0.001
  >9.3–15.0 2.47 (1.38 to 4.39) 2.70 (1.44 to 5.05) 2.51 (1.34 to 4.71)
  >15.0–26.5 2.72 (1.52 to 4.88) 2.96 (1.57 to 5.59) 2.47 (1.31 to 4.66)
  >26.5 4.85 (2.68 to 8.80) 4.77 (2.49 to 9.14) 3.71 (1.93 to 7.13)
 NT-proBNP, pg/ml (reference: ≤47.6)
  >47.6–95.8 2.71 (1.28 to 5.75) <0.001 2.71 (1.23 to 5.98) <0.001 2.57 (1.17 to 5.68) <0.001
  >95.8–188.8 4.11 (1.99 to 8.50) 3.72 (1.72 to 8.04) 3.41 (1.58 to 7.39)
  >188.8–433.0 5.73 (2.80 to 11.74) 5.47 (2.55 to 11.74) 4.76 (2.21 to 10.23)
  >433.0 11.83 (5.75 to 24.34) 9.57 (4.40 to 20.83) 8.07 (3.70 to 17.64)
a

Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, clinical center, diabetes status, self-reported cardiovascular disease at baseline, current smoking, alcohol use, log(24-hour urine total protein excretion), eGFR, systolic BP, body mass index, LDL, and HDL.

b

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 variables plus hemoglobin, angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin receptor blocker use, diuretic use, β-blocker use, serum phosphorus, log(PTH), and log(FGF23).

c

Model 3 adjusted for model 2 variables plus the alternative cardiac biomarker (e.g., adjusted for NT-proBNP and hsTnT in the models and vice versa).

d

Detectable levels of hsTnT were divided into quartiles; NT-proBNP categories were defined by quintiles.