Table. Demographic characteristics of febrile patients tested for seropositivity for SFG and STG rickettsioses, Kenya* .
Characteristic | SFG, no. positive/no. tested (%) | OR (95% CI) | STG, no. positive/no. tested (%) | OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | ||||
F | 96/1,094 (9) | 1.0 | 43/694 (6) | 1.0 |
M | 116/1,131 (10) | 1.2 (0.9–1.6) | 24/707 (3) | 0.5 (0.3–0.9†* |
Age, y | ||||
<5 | 41/1,107 (4) | 1.0 | 17/687 (3) | 1.0 |
5–12 | 62/622 (10) | 2.9 (1.9–4.4)† | 29/423 (6) | 2.9 (1.5–5.7) |
13–26 | 63/290 (22) | 7.2 (4.7–11.2)† | 10/ 166 (6) | 2.5 (1.0–6.0)† |
>26 | 46/206 (22) | 7.5 (4.6–12.1)† | 11/125 (9) | 3.8 (1.6–8.8)† |
Animal contact | ||||
Goats | ||||
No contact | 205/2,188 (9) | 1.0 | 60/1,372 (4) | 1.0 |
Contact | 7/37 (19) | 2.3 (0.8– 5.3) | 7/29 (24) | 7.0 (2.4–17.7)† |
Cows | ||||
No contact | 207/2,187 (10) | 1.0 | 65/1,377 (5) | 1.0 |
Contact | 5/38 (13) | 1.4 (0.4−3.8) | 2/24 (8) | 1.8 (0.2–7.7) |
Donkeys | ||||
No contact | 211/2,223 (10) | 1.0 | 67/1,399 (5) | 1.0 |
Contact | 1/2 (50) | 9.5 (0.1–748.8) | 0/2 (0) | 0 (0–38.7) |
Cats | ||||
No contact | 203/2,106 (10) | 1.0 | 66/1,315 (5) | 1.0 |
Contact | 9/119 (8) | 0.8 (0.3–1.5) | 1/86 (1) | 0.2 (0.05–1.3) |
Sheep | ||||
No contact | 212/2,218 (10) | 1.0 | 67/1,387 (5) | 1.0 |
Contact | 0/7 (0) | 0 (0–5.2) | 0/14 (0) | 0.0 (0–5.5) |
Dogs | ||||
No contact | 210/2,146 (10) | 1.0 | 67/1,398 (5) | 1.0 |
Contact | 2/79 (3) | 0.2 (0.03–0.9) | 0/3 (0) | 0.0 (0–11) |
Camels | ||||
No contact | 196/2,173 (9) | 1.0 | 67/1,365 (5) | 1.0 |
Contact | 16/52 (31) | 4.5 (2.3–8.5)† | 0/36 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–2.1) |
*SFG, spotted fever group; STG, scrub typhus group; OR, odds ratio. †Seroprevalence for both spotted fever and scrub typhus increased with age; there were significant differences (p<0.05) between those <5 years of age and those in older age groups for SFG and those >12 years of age for STG. Exposure to SFG and STG were more likely in patients who had contact with dogs and camels for SFG and goats for STG (p<0.05). OR, odds ratio.