[Table/Fig-1]:
Responses of the surveyed clinical dentists practicing in northern Saudi Arabia on questions regarding location preference for posterior composite restorations use (total n = 136). Data shown are n (%)
| Location | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Class I with Occlusal Contact (Functional inclines) | 4 (2.9%) | 132 (97.1%) |
| Class I Without Occlusal Contact (Non Functional Inclines) | 49 (36%) | 87 (64%) |
| Class II | 23 (16.9%) | 113 (83.1%) |
| Proximal surface without Marginal Ridge involvement | 72 (52.9%) | 64 (47.1%) |
| Small Defects (Class V) | 106 (77.9%) | 30 (22.1%) |
| All Cavities | 19 (13.9%) | 117 (86.1%) |
| Patient’s Aesthetic Demands | 122(89.7%) | 14 (10.3%) |
| Amalgam Replacement | 30 (22.1%) | 106 (77.9%) |
| Restoration of Endodontically treated teeth | 57 (41.9%) | 79 (58.1%) |