Table 3. Summary of introgression studies: Phenotypes of HMS and SRD of various introgression lines.
| # Genotype 1 | Sample size (n) | Offspring (f) (mean ± s.e.m.) | Sex ratio (k) 2 (mean ± s.e.m.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. D1D2D3D4;S3 | 27 | 73.6 ± 11.5 | 0.823 ± 0.015 |
| B. D1D2D3D4;S4 | 14 | Total 1 male and 5 females | - |
| C. D1D2D3D4 | 67 | Total 5 females only | - |
| D. D1;S3S4 | 18 | 101.1 ± 10.5 | 0.527 ± 0.014 |
| E. D1;S3 | 45 | 110.0 ± 8.4 | 0.500 ± 0.007 |
| F. D1;S4 | 43 | 20.4 ± 5.2 | 0.504 ± 0.018 |
| G. D1 | 118 | Total 3 females only | - |
| H. D1D2D3;S3S4 | 18 | 95.2 ± 10.9 | 0.821 ± 0.026 |
| I. D1D2D3 | 29 | No offspring | - |
| J. D2D3D4;S3S4 | 23 | 110.5 ± 11.8 | 0.692 ± 0.019 |
| K. D2D3D4;S3 | 92 | 106.1 ± 3.6 | 0.707 ± 0.006 |
| L. D2D3D4;S4 | 84 | 19.7 ± 2.4 | 0.799 ± 0.018 |
| M. D2D3D4 | 85 | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 0.864 ± 0.029 |
| N. D2D3;S3S4 | 24 | 147.3 ± 9.0 | 0.713 ± 0.023 |
| O. D2D3 | 85 | 8.1 ± 1.4 | 0.766 ± 0.017 |
| P. D3D4;S3S4 | 17 | 201.1 ± 12.2 | 0.679 ± 0.013 |
| Q. D3D4;S3 | 18 | 134.0 ± 8.1 | 0.686 ± 0.024 |
| R. D3D4 | 10 | 67.4 ± 20.6 | 0.703 ± 0.020 |
| S. D2 | 28 | 68.5 ± 6.4 | 0.506 ± 0.013 |
| T. D4 | 31 | 100.4 ± 8.2 | 0.500 ± 0.010 |
| U. S4 | 33 | 99.8 ± 13.1 | 0.499 ± 0.009 |
| V. N;N control 3 | 108 | 114.9 ± 4.8 | 0.508 ± 0.004 |
1For all introgression genotypes, the distorters (D1—D4) and suppressors (S3, S4) are defined by two closely linked flanking markers of alb267. D2 is hemizygous because it is on the X while D3, D4, S3 and S4 are all heterozygous; the other alleles of nas314 are not shown.
2Sex ratio summary statistics obtained by bootstrapping.
3All markers have the nas314 alleles.