Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 31;9:49. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00049

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of the anti-kindling effects at t = 128 s for the RVS and the SVS-100 CR stimulation. (A) Boxplots of the average synaptic strength, Cav, at t = 128 s as a function of the stimulation intensity, K, for the RVS and the SVS-100 CR stimulation. (B) Boxplots of the order parameter R averaged over the last 1.6 s, Rav, as a function of K for the RVS and the SVS-100 CR stimulation. The RVS CR results for the same K-values are shown in red and slightly shifted to the left and the SVS-100 results are shown in blue and slightly shifted to the right. The black lines within the boxes show the medians for each condition, the boxes the middle 50% and the whiskers below (above) the boxes the first (last, respectively) 25%. Outliers are defined as 1.5 times the length of the box below or above the box and represented by open circles. For each condition (K-value and type of CR) the simulations are repeated eleven times for different initial conditions of the network in combination with different sequence orders. One asterisk indicates a significantly lower Cav - or Rav-value compared to the values obtained by the RVS CR stimulation (one-sided Mann-Whitney test with p < 0.05).