Table 3.

SPAN logistic regression models predicting volunteering.

Variable	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
	B	Odds [95% CI]	B	Odds [95% CI]	B	Odds [95% CI]
Age	.01	1.01 [.98, 1.05]	.01	1.01 [.97, 1.06]	0	1.00 [.96, 1.05]
Gender	.39*	1.48 [1.20, 1.84]	.31	1.37 [1.07, 1.75]	.35*	1.42 [1.11, 1.82]
Education level	.35*	1.42 [1.31, 1.55]	.38*	1.46 [1.32, 1.61]	.37*	1.45 [1.31, 1.61]
Conscientiousness	.36*	1.43 [1.06, 1.94]	−.22	.80 [.54, 1.20]	.49	1.63 [.73, 3.79]
Extraversion			.93*	2.53 [1.76, 3.65]	.97*	2.65 [1.84, 3.84]
Agreeableness			.56*	1.75 [1.16, 2.63]	.58*	1.78 [1.18, 2.70]
Neuroticism			−.22	.80 [.57, 1.13]	−.22	.80 [.56, 1.14]
Openness			−.16	.85 [.61, 1.19]	−.16	.85 [.61, 1.20]
Working group compared to retired group					−.20	.82 [.60, 1.12]
Not employed group compared to retired group					−.33	.72 [.47, 1.09]
Conscientious × working dummy variable					−1.11*	.33 [.13, .80]
Conscientious × not employed dummy variable					.03	1.03 [.31, 3.51]

Model 1: NEO-PI-R conscientiousness with age, gender, and level of education, N = 1502.

Model 2: NEO-PI-R conscientiousness with age, gender, level of education, and other Big Five traits, N = 1333.

Model 3: NEO-PI-R conscientiousness and work status interaction with all controls, N = 1307.

^*p < .05.